RALSTON v. BEARD et al
| JOHN W. RALSTON, JR. |
| JEFFREY BEARD, WARDEN PICKINS, WARDEN SOBINA, SGT. SANTORELLA, SGT. WERTZ, DR. SALAMECH, DR. UNTRACHT, MS. KOWALESWKI and MS. OVERTON |
| 3:2010cv00008 |
| January 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Somerset |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Keith A. Pesto |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 71 Motion for New Trial, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/9/2013. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 67 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 8/28/2012. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is hereby Ordered that the motions to dismiss the complaint, docket no. 20 , docket no. 23 , are granted as to all defendants and claims except for the claim that Defendant Untracht assaulted Plaintiff on 11/6/2009; 43 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The motion to dismiss at docket no. 41 is denied as redundant, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/1/2011. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
