BROOKER v. ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
Plaintiff: JOSEPHINE BROOKER
Defendant: JOHN or JANE DOE, ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY, CHERYL JOHNS and LINDA WALTER
Case Number: 3:2011cv00095
Filed: April 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Johnstown Office
County: Blair
Presiding Judge: Kim R. Gibson
Nature of Suit: Housing/Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 93 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT denying 44 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted with respect to the claims arising under t he Housing Act and Fourteenth Amendment and Denied with respect to the claims arising under the FHAA, the Rehabilitation Act and the ADA. The Plaintiff's request for punitive damages is Dismissed. Defendants Cheryl Johns and Linda Walter are D ismissed as parties to this action and the caption is Amended to reflect the fact that only the Altoona Housing Authority remains as a defendant in this case, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order of Court. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 6/12/2013. (dlg) Modified on 6/12/2013. (dlg)
March 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT - this matter coming before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Verified Complaint (Doc. No. 4 ), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: Defendants' Motion is GRANTED as to claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Fair Housing Act against Defendants Walter and Johns in their individual capacities only. These claims are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants' Motion is DENIED in all other respects, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order of Court. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/16/2012. (dlg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BROOKER v. ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN or JANE DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALTOONA HOUSING AUTHORITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHERYL JOHNS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LINDA WALTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSEPHINE BROOKER
Represented By: Kevin L. Quisenberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?