WATSON v. WETZEL et al
| JOSEPH WATSON |
| JACK LOUGHRY, SUSAN DORR, GERALD L. ROZUM, JOSEPH, DAVID HUNTER, DAVID ONSTEAD, DORINA VARNER, DELORES CHANEY and JOHN E. WETZEL |
| 3:2011cv00281 |
| December 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Somerset |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 24 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety with the exception of his Eighth Amendment an d retaliation claims regarding the denial of personal hygiene products against Defendants Onstead and Hunter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is not permitted to amend his Complaint as it is clear that granting him leave to do so would be futil e. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31 ) dated January 9, 2013, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is remanded back to Magistrate Judge Lenihan for all further pretrial proceedings, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 2/8/2013. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
