NANCE v. MARIANA
Petitioner: MILTON R. NANCE
Respondent: MARIANA
Case Number: 3:2012cv00140
Filed: July 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office: Johnstown Office
County: Cambria
Presiding Judge: Kim R. Gibson
Presiding Judge: Maureen P. Kelly
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying as moot 6 Motion to Compel the Payment of Funds as moot given that the filing fee has been forwarded to the Clerk's Office by Petitioner's custodians; denying 6 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/18/2012. A copy of this NEF together with the order is being sent to Petitioner at his address of record. (tmr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NANCE v. MARIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MILTON R. NANCE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARIANA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?