LYONS v. ICKES et al
| DAVID LYONS |
| SCI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CAROL ICKES, C/O FLICK, DOCTOR BENNER, DENISE THOMAS, DOCTOR SCHMIDT and DOCTOR GRIER |
| 3:2012cv00182 |
| August 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Somerset |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is hereby Ordered that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants (ECF No. 57 ) is GRANTED as to all federal claims on the ground that Plaintiff did not properly exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to the PLRA . It is Ordered that Plaintiff's state law negligence claims are DISMISSED without prejudice forthwith; It is further Ordered that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 73 ) dated 11/19/2013, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. It is fur ther Ordered that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. And it is further Ordered that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has 30 days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 1/16/2014. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
