PIAZZA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
PRESTON PIAZZA |
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHERYL KRAMER, MARK KRAMER, ERICK TICE, RANDALL BRITTON and STEVEN GLUNT |
3:2012cv00194 |
September 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Johnstown Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Kim R. Gibson |
Keith A. Pesto |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion in Limine, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/21/2016. (dlg) |
Filing 51 MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; 47 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/9/2013. (dlg) |
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM ORDER - it is Ordered that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Docket No. 6 and Docket No. 10 are granted as to all Defendants and claims except for the Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Cheryl Kramer. No further leave to amend the complaint is granted; 13 Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. The matter remains with the Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 10/16/2012. (dlg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.