BARREN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
| DAVID MORRIS BARREN |
| PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TROOPER WESLEY BERKEBILE, TROOPER SERGEANT ANTHONY DELUCA, TROOPER MIKE SCHMIDT, TROOPER JOHN A. LITCHKO, TROOPER MICHAEL J. VOLK, TROOPER STUART FROME, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL GERALD J. PAPPERT, DEPUTY A.G. JESSE D. PETTIT and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LISA LAZARRI-STRASISER |
| 3:2014cv00134 |
| June 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Somerset |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 6/9/17. (jg)
|
|
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM ORDER indicating that that the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; that the Report and Recommendation 7 , is adopted as the opi nion of the Court as supplemented by this Order. The Clerk is to mark the case closed; All pending motions are denied as moot; Lastly, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 9/19/14. (jg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
