BECKER v. VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA, INC. et al
| LISA LABRASCA BECKER |
| VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA, INC., VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA, LLC., DEBT RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC and CBE GROUP, INC. |
| 3:2016cv00170 |
| July 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Clearfield |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Defendant's motion (ECF No. 20 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the motion is GRANTED with respect to Counts 3 and 4, which are hereby DISMISSED. But Defendants' motion is DENIED with r espect to Count 2. Lisa Becker is granted leave to amend her complaint with respect to her negligence and invasion of privacy claims against Debt Recovery Solutions. If she chooses to do so, she shall file a second amended complaint on or before Jun e 16, 2017. Verizon Pennsylvania, Inc. is hereby terminated as a Defendant. A telephonic status conference is scheduled for June 21, 2017, at 1:30 p.m., to determine whether it will be necessary to adjust the discovery deadlines contained in the Court's initial scheduling order dated January 6, 2017 (ECF No. 24 ), and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 6/2/2017. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
