ADAMS v. GLASS et al
| SHAUN DAVID ADAMS |
| LIEUTENANT GLASS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOYER and JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICER |
| 3:2016cv00218 |
| October 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Clearfield |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Maureen P. Kelly |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER - it is hereby Ordered that the Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 60 , is GRANTED. It is further Ordered that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if any party wishes to appeal from this Order a notice of appeal, as provided in Fed.R.App.P. 3, must be filed with the Clerk of Court within thirty (30) days, and as more fully stated in said Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 7/13/2018. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER - it is hereby Ordered that, as to Defendant Boyer, the Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 22 , is DENIED. IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that as to Defendant Glass, the Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 22 , is GRANTED without prejudice to Plaintiff's abilit y to file, within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, an Amended Complaint curing the defects identified herein and setting forth all desired allegations and claims against all parties, and as more fully stated in said Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 7/20/2017. (dlg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
