MUNKSJO PAPER AB v. BEDFORD MATERIALS CO., INC.
||MUNKSJO PAPER AB
||BEDFORD MATERIALS CO., INC.
||December 27, 2016
||US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
||Kim R. Gibson
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 18, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Count III of Defendant's First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims (ECF No. 35 ), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memo randum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Count III of Defendant's First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims (ECF No. 35 ) is GRANTED. Accordingly, Count III of Defendant's First Amend ed Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is HEREBY GRANTED leave to amend its First Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims on or before May 9, 2018, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 4/18/2018. (dlg) Modified on 4/18/2018. (cel)
|January 9, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER terminating 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED to the extent that only Count IV of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendant's Motion is DENIED in all other regards, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 1/9/2018. (dlg)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?