BOOZER v. SMITH et al
| RICHARD L. BOOZER, SR. |
| GARRY SMITH, DAVID J. CLOSE, FOT CENTRALIZED SERVICES, CORRECT CARE SOLUTION, CO. INC., JANET PEARSON, MUHAMMED NAJI, JOSEPH NACEL and CASEY W. THORNY |
| 3:2018cv00006 |
| January 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
242
ORDER indicating that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion 241 , it is hereby ordered that the Motion for Summary Judgment 168 is granted. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 12/18/2020. (bsc)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 28 summary judgment to Medical Defendants Naji, Thornley, Nagle, and Correct Care Solutions, Inc. (CCS) on all of Plaintiff's claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Summary judgment 28 w ill be granted to Medical Defendant Barnes on all of Plaintiff's claims, with the exception of the deliberate indifference claim, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The Motion to Dismiss 28 is DENIED on Plaintiff's deliberat e indifference claim against Medical Defendant Margaret Barnes. Medical Defendant Margaret Barnes shall file an Answer in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A). Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 10/10/2018. (bsc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
