BROOKS v. REIFER et al
| NAZARIO BROOKS |
| MR. JOHN REIFER, MR. HOLENICK, FRANCIS PARIZOLLA, MR. BARRINGER and MR. GLEASON |
| 3:2018cv00173 |
| August 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Kim R Gibson |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF COURT. Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint that fully outlines all complaint allegations concerning solely SCI Cresson and SCI Houtzdale, both institutions in which Plaintiff was previously housed. This Amended Complaint must be filed no later than 10/5/2018. Failure to file an Amended Complaint as outlined herein may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 09/05/18. A copy of this Order will be mailed to Plaintiff this day, 09/05/18. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca)
|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Pennsylvania Eastern; Case Number 2:18-cv-03510. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 3
ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL TRANSFER THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSLYVANIA. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 8/22/18. 8/23/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER.(jpd )
|
| Filing 2 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against MR. BARRINGER, MR. GLEASON, MR. HOLENICK, FRANCIS PARIZOLLA, JOHN REIFER filed by NAZARIO BROOKS.(pr, ) |
|
Filing 1
ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REOPEN THIS CASE; THE MAY 17, 2018 ORDER (DOC. NO. 22) DISMISSING THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE IS VACATED; PLFF'S CLAIMS ALLEGING VIOLATIONS OF CRIMINAL LAWS, HIS CLAIMS AGAINST OTHER INMATES, HIS CLAIMS REGARDING ALLEGED SEXUAL ENCOUNTERS WITH NICOLE BONETZ, MARY MOORE, AND LENORA CLAYTON, AND CLAIMS RAISED ON BEHALF OF HIS CHILDREN'S MOTHER AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS ARE DISMISSED; AN APPROPRIATE JUDGMENT WILL FOLLOW; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL AMEND THE CAPTION TO REFLECT THAT THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS ARE THE NAMED DEFTS. AGAINST WHOM THIS MATTER WILL PROCEED: JOANNE AVERY; NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL; ABDUL MOSELY, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL; MR. BEECHER, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL; OFFICER, TIAMANI, CFCF; JEAN ARDNT, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL; NURSE DOROTHY PATTERSON, NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL; MR. GREENE II, PHILADELPHIA SHERIFF'S DEPT.; AND MR FORCELY, PHILADELPHIA SHERIFF'S DEPT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONSES AT THIS TIME. RATHER, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REFER THIS MATTER TO THE PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS PANEL FOR THE EDPA FOR POSSIBLE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, THIS MATTER SHALL REMAIN IN SUSPENSE; THE CLERK SHALL OPEN A NEW CIVIL ACTION, USING A COPY OF THS ORDER AND A COPY OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINTFILED IN THIS ACTION (DOC. NO. 23). THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL OPEN A SECOND NEW CIVIL ACTION, USING A COPY OF THIS ORDER AND A COPY OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 23), ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 8/17/18. 8/20/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF. AND 1 COPY TO PRO SE LAW CLERK, 1 COPY TO PRO SE WRIT CLERK(pr, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
