BLOWERS v. BERRYHILL
| PAUL R. BLOWERS, JR. |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and CIVIL PROCESS CLERK |
| 3:2018cv00205 |
| October 11, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Kim R Gibson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by PAUL R. BLOWERS, JR. CIVIL PROCESS CLERK served on 10/22/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (Pothoven, Mary) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by PAUL R. BLOWERS, JR. NANCY A. BERRYHILL served on 10/18/2018, answer due 12/17/2018. (Pothoven, Mary) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by PAUL R. BLOWERS, JR. CIVIL PROCESS CLERK served on 10/18/2018, answer due 12/17/2018. (Pothoven, Mary) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by PAUL R. BLOWERS, JR. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL served on 10/18/2018, answer due 12/17/2018. (Pothoven, Mary) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to NANCY A. BERRYHILL (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (cel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NANCY A. BERRYHILL (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number 0315-4893207), filed by PAUL R. BLOWERS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Attorney General, #3 Summons U.S. Attorney, #4 Summons Chief Counsel) (ept) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
