MERRITTS v. RICHARDS et al
| STEWART MERRITTS, JR |
| PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, EDWARD BETTWY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, MARK CHAPPELL and LESLIE RICHARDS |
| 3:2018cv00212 |
| October 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Kim R Gibson |
| Real Property: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott A. Bradley on behalf of EDWARD BETTWY, MARK CHAPPELL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, LESLIE RICHARDS. (Bradley, Scott) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that the instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (krh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EDWARD BETTWY, MARK CHAPPELL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, LESLIE RICHARDS (Filing fee $400, Receipt No. 34668004661), filed by STEWART MERRITTS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt) (sdp) Modified on 10/23/2018. (jjg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
