LEAL v. FCI LORETTO WARDEN
| ROBERT LEAL |
| FCI LORETTO WARDEN |
| 3:2018cv00219 |
| October 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Kim R Gibson |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Motion to Appoint Counsel albeit without prejudice to re-filing such a motion but only after the Respondent has filed an Answer and the issues are more clearly defined. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 12-18-2018. A copy of the order is being sent to Petitioner at his address of record via first class mail. (tmr)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by ROBERT LEAL. Motion referred to Maureen P. Kelly. (ept) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/14/2018: #1 Inmate Account Statement) #2 Envelope) (jd) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF COURT - After de novo review of the filings in this case, the IFP Motion is hereby DENIED. The Report is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. Petitioner is Ordered to pay the entire filing fee by 12/21/2018 or the case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Motion for Appointment of Trained Counsel is DENIED, albeit without prejudice to Petitioner filing a new Motion for Appointment of Counsel but only after an Answer has been filed and the issues are more clearly defined, and as more fully stated in said Order of Court. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 11/27/2018. (dlg)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Trained Counsel by ROBERT LEAL. Motion(s) referred to Maureen P. Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (jd) |
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ROBERT LEAL, recommending that the IFP Motion be denied because Petitioner has more than sufficient funds to pay the $5.00 filing fee with sufficient funds remaining thereafter for his personal needs. Objections to R&R for Unregistered ECF Users due by 11/23/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 11/6/2018. A copy of the Report together with this Notice of Electronic Filing are being sent to Petitioner at his address of record via first class mail. (tmr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ROBERT LEAL. Motion(s) referred to Maureen P. Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Petition Lodged pending outcome of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Envelope) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LEAL v. FCI LORETTO WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ROBERT LEAL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: FCI LORETTO WARDEN | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
