HECTOR v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE et al
Petitioner: MEDERA HECTOR
Respondent: DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE and CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Case Number: 3:2019cv00192
Filed: November 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Reed Eddy
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall make service of this Order by certified mail, together with a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, upon the Director of the Department of Homeland Security, the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, and the Attorney General of the United States of America. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within sixty (60) days of this Order, the Respondents shall answer or otherwise respond to the allegations of the Petition. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 12/11/2019. (sms)
November 25, 2019 Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Proper Filing. The Clerk of Court is directed to correct the docket in this case to reflect that Petitioner has brought his claim under 28 U.S.C. section 2241, not 28 U.S.C. section 2254 as the docket indicates. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/25/2019. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bsc)
November 22, 2019 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 34668005101), filed by MEDERA HECTOR. (Attachments: #1 Receipt) (plp)
November 22, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION FOR PROPER FILING by MEDERA HECTOR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd)
November 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING. The Petition has been received without a filing fee or the forms required to proceed in forma pauperis in a habeas case. Petitioner may reopen the case by paying the $5.00 filing fee or filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 11/18/2019. (bsc)
November 7, 2019 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged pending payment of filing fee or disposition of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (plp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HECTOR v. DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MEDERA HECTOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY/ICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHRISTIAN M. SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?