JACKSON v. ESTOCK et al
BLAINE V. JACKSON |
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LEE ESTOCK and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF JOHNSTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA |
3:2020cv00168 |
August 19, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Kim R Gibson |
Keith A Pesto |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by BLAINE V. JACKSON, recommending that the petition be dismissed without need of service or response and that no certificate of appealability issue and as more fully stated; Objections to R&R due by 10/27/2020 Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 10/13/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (plp) |
Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 34668005405), filed by BLAINE V. JACKSON. (Attachments: #1 Receipt) (plp) |
Filing 2 ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING; the Clerk shall mark this matter administratively closed until petitioner pays the filing fee or files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with an inmate account statement and as more fully stated in said order. Blank consent/district judge option form sent to petitioner. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 8/26/2020. (plp) |
Filing 1 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged with no filing fee or In Forma Pauperis motion (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.