MCMILLEN v. WETZEL et al
| KEENAN MCMILLEN |
| THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN WETZEL |
| 3:2020cv00192 |
| September 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by KEENAN MCMILLEN. (Attachments: #1 authorization, #2 Proposed Order, #3 account statement, #4 Envelope) (sdp)
|
|
Filing 2
DEFICIENCY ORDER: In light of the deficiencies noted in the attached Order, The Clerk of Court is to mark this case administratively closed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may reopen this case by curing the noted deficiencies no later than November 5, 2020. Failure to file a complaint by that date may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 10/5/2020. Copy of this Notice, Deficiency Order, and the Court's form motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis have been mailed to Plaintiff's address of record. (et)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by KEENAN MCMILLEN. (Attachments: #1 complaint, #2 inmate account statement, #3 memorandum, #4 Proposed Order, #5 Envelope) (sdp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
