NUNEZ v. BORSTNAR et al
| FERNANDO NUNEZ, JR. |
| LT. LEVADNUK, MARK BORSTNAR, BRANDON CROYLE and LANDON SINCLAIR |
| 3:2020cv00208 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 cr |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Compliance re #7 Response/Briefing Schedule by Sarah J. Simkin on behalf of All Defendants (Simkin, Sarah) |
Filing 7
ORDER Response/Briefing Schedule re #5 the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THE PENDING MOTION WILL BE TREATED AS A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56 WITH RESPECT TO THE ISSUE OF PLAINTIFF'S EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no formal discovery, such as interrogatories, requests for production or requests for admission will be allowed in this case without leave of court. However, no later than December 1, 2020, the moving Defendants shall provide Plaintiff with all grievances and appeals or other similar documents in its possession concerning the alleged incident or incidents at issue in the Complaint if said documents exist and have not already been provided to Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until January 4, 2021 to respond to the Defendants' Motion as described more fully herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on November 17, 2020. (kcb)
|
| Filing 6 BRIEF in Support re #5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by MARK BORSTNAR, BRANDON CROYLE, LEVADNUK, LANDON SINCLAIR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Simkin, Sarah) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by MARK BORSTNAR, BRANDON CROYLE, LEVADNUK, LANDON SINCLAIR. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Simkin, Sarah) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by FERNANDO NUNEZ, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ma) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by MARK BORSTNAR, BRANDON CROYLE, LEVADNUK, LANDON SINCLAIR. (Simkin, Sarah) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER that because this case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge, each party must execute and file the form consenting to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge or selecting the option to have the case randomly assigned to a District Judge no later than November 16, 2020. The applicable form is available on the Court's website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov in the forms section. THE EVENT USED FOR DOCKETING THIS FORM IS FOUND UNDER OTHER DOCUMENTS, CALLED CONSENT TO TRIAL BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR DISTRICT JUDGE. If the parties elect to have the case assigned to a District Judge, Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan will continue to manage the case as provided for in Local Rule 72G. Any party who has filed a Consent to Trial by a Magistrate Judge or District Judge form does not need to refile it. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 10/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form) (jmb)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Somerset County, case number 506 cv 2020 with Jury Demand Copies attached: State Court Complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $400, receipt number APAWDC-6000431), filed by LEVADNUK, BRANDON CROYLE, LANDON SINCLAIR, MARK BORSTNAR. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
