CHANEY v. MOSER
| DURYANE CHANEY |
| WARDEN VICKIE MOSER |
| 3:2020cv00223 |
| November 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Kim R Gibson |
| Keith A Pesto |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 USCA Case Number 20-3580 for #7 Notice of Appeal,, filed by DURYANE CHANEY. USCA Case Manager Laurie (DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED AND CAN ONLY BE VIEWED BY COURT STAFF) (lr3) |
| Filing 8 LETTER from Clerk re #7 Notice of Appeal, to pay appeal filing fee or submit a motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. (jv) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #6 Order Dismissing Case, by DURYANE CHANEY. Motion for IFP N/A. Certificate of Appealability N/A. Court Reporter(s): None. The Clerk's Office hereby certifies the record and the docket sheet available through ECF to be the certified list in lieu of the record and/or the certified copy of the docket entries. The Transcript Purchase Order form will NOT be mailed to the parties. The form is available on the Court's internet site. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
Filing 6
ORDER - It is Ordered that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed, and as more fully stated in said Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 12/3/2020. (dlg)
|
| Filing 5 OBJECTIONS to #4 Report and Recommendation by DURYANE CHANEY. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jv) |
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by DURYANE CHANEY, recommending that the petition be dismissed without service. The Clerk shall draw a District Judge with reference back to Judge Pesto and as more fully stated; Objections to R&R due by 11/20/2020 Objections to R&R for Unregistered ECF Users due by 11/23/2020 Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 11/6/2020. (plp) |
| Filing 3 BRIEF in Support of #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by DURYANE CHANEY. (jv) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 34668005448), filed by DURYANE CHANEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Receipt) (jv) |
| Filing 1 Remark: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus lodged since no Fee was received and no Motion for Informa Paupris was received. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CHANEY v. MOSER | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DURYANE CHANEY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN VICKIE MOSER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
