SHOWALTER v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY SHOWALTER
Defendant: C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Case Number: 3:2021cv00087
Filed: May 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Stephanie L Haines
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER re #13 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice filed by SHIRLEY SHOWALTER - IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned parties, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that this case be dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED, Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 6/8/2021. (dlg)
June 7, 2021 Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal - JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by SHIRLEY SHOWALTER. (Rol, Anna)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER OF COURT granting #11 Motion for Anna N. Rol to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 6/1/2021. (dlg)
May 28, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION for attorney Anna N. Rol to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-6538270) by SHIRLEY SHOWALTER. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Anna N. Rol, #2 Proposed Order) (Rol, Anna)
May 17, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Caleb Holmes on behalf of BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED, C R BARD INCORPORATED. (Holmes, Caleb)
May 17, 2021 Filing 9 Disclosure Statement identifying Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of C.R. Bard, Inc. and C.R. Bard is a wholly owned subsidiary of Becton, Dickinson and Company as corporate parent or other affiliate, by BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED, C R BARD INCORPORATED. (Feeney, Brian)
May 17, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian T. Feeney on behalf of BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED, C R BARD INCORPORATED. (Feeney, Brian)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 and 16.2, an Initial Rule 16 Case Management Conference shall be held on June 15, 2021, at 10:30 a.m., and as more fully stated in said Case Management Order. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 5/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Stipulation Selecting ADR, #2 Exhibit "B" - Fed.R.Civ. P. 26(f) Report, #3 Exhibit "C" - Initial Scheduling Order) (dlg)
May 13, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (sas)
May 12, 2021 Filing 5 Case transferred in from District of Arizona; Case Number 2:18-cv-03112. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
May 7, 2021 Remark: Transferring Case to the Western District of Pennsylvania via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP)
April 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 AMENDED FINAL SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER. See Order for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 4/26/21. (MAP)
April 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 *AMENDED by Doc. #4 --FINAL SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER. See Order for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 4/20/21. (MAP) Modified on 4/29/2021 (SJF).
October 1, 2018 Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G Campbell, with member case number: CV-18-03112-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SLQ)
October 1, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16022709 filed by Shirley Showalter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(SLQ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHOWALTER v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C R BARD INCORPORATED
Represented By: Richard B. North, Jr.
Represented By: Brian T. Feeney
Represented By: Caleb Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Represented By: Richard B. North, Jr.
Represented By: Brian T. Feeney
Represented By: Caleb Holmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY SHOWALTER
Represented By: Russell W Budd
Represented By: Sindhu Daniel
Represented By: Laura J Baughman
Represented By: Anna Natalie Rol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?