BENNETT v. LANTZ et al
STEPHON M. BENNETT |
C/O1 A. OHLER and C/O1 S. LANTZ |
3:2021cv00107 |
June 16, 2021 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Kim R Gibson |
Keith A Pesto |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION to Alter or Amend #4 Order for Statistical Case Closing, by STEPHON M. BENNETT. Motion(s) referred to Keith A. Pesto. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ijh) |
Filing 4 ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING denying #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk shall mark this matter administratively closed (that is not a dismissal) until plaintiff pays the filing fee. The clerk shall re-open the matter upon receipt of the filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 6/23/2021. (bgs) |
Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto added. (dlg) |
Filing 3 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by STEPHON M. BENNETT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ma) |
Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by STEPHON M. BENNETT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ma) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by STEPHON M. BENNETT. (Attachments: #1 Authorization, #2 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #3 Proposed Motion to Obtain Service of Process Without Prepayment of U.S. Marshal Fee, #4 Envelope) (ma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.