PASSMORE v. TICE et al
| JOHN PASSMORE |
| ERIC TICE, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BUCKS COUNTY |
| 3:2021cv00115 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Stephanie L Haines |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 REPLY to Response to Motion re #2 Report and Recommendation, filed by JOHN PASSMORE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (elt) |
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JOHN PASSMORE. Because Petitioner is challenging the validity of his conviction that was obtained in the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, it is recommended that this case be transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.Petitioner is permitted to file written objections to R&R by 8/16/2021. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/29/2021. (bsc) |
| Judge Stephanie L. Haines and Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy added. (cel) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 34668005659), filed by JOHN PASSMORE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit (Motion for IFP), #3 Receipt) (elt) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/2/2021: #4 Exhibit) (elt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
