SMITH v. MOSER et al
Plaintiff: CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Defendant: WARDEN V. MOSER, BOP DIRECTOR and BOP NER DIRECTOR
Case Number: 3:2021cv00186
Filed: October 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Keith A Pesto
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2021 Filing 7 Remark: Envelope containing #4 Order returned to clerk's office marked "Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed, Unable to Forward." Order mailed to updated address provided by CHARLES PAUL SMITH. (bgs)
December 14, 2021 Filing 6 Remark: Correspondence from the Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (lar)
November 29, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by CHARLES PAUL SMITH. FILER advised that the change of address has been made on above captioned matter only. If you wish to have address changed on other matters before this court, it is your responsibility to file such a notice at each case number. This NEF has been mailed to CHARLES PAUL SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kss)
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING: The Clerk shall mark this matter administratively closed (that is not a dismissal) until petitioner pays the filing fee or files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with an inmate account statement. Assuming that plaintiff corrects the deficiencies in his current pleading the matter will then be ordered served as appropriate. Failure to arrange to pay the filing fee within a reasonable time will result in the dismissal of the complaint for failure to prosecute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 10/29/2021. (bgs)
October 21, 2021 Filing 3 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by CHARLES PAUL SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cel)
October 21, 2021 Filing 2 Errata re #1 Remark by CHARLES PAUL SMITH. Reason for Correction: Attaching Envelope. (cel)
October 21, 2021 Filing 1 Remark: Complaint lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (cel) Modified text on 10/28/2021 to add linkage to Errata at #2 . (lar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. MOSER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES PAUL SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WARDEN V. MOSER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOP DIRECTOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOP NER DIRECTOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?