Q.C. v. SONG et al
| Q.C. |
| GONG YANG SONG, CINDY SONG, ZHAN HAO GUO, KEVIN GUO and FUSION BUFFET, LLC |
| 3:2021cv00204 |
| November 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Stephanie L Haines |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order). Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 12/01/2021. (dag)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dag) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to FUSION BUFFET, LLC, KEVIN GUO, ZHAN HAO GUO, CINDY SONG, GONG YANG SONG (Attachments: #1 Summons Cindy Song, #2 Summons Zhan Hao Guo, #3 Summons Kevin Guo, #4 Summons Fusion Buffet) (kss) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FUSION BUFFET, LLC, KEVIN GUO, ZHAN HAO GUO, CINDY SONG, GONG YANG SONG (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6822891), filed by Q.C. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1) (kss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
