TODARO v. WARDEN SCI HOUTZDALE et al
Petitioner: JOSEPH TODARO, SR.
Respondent: WARDEN SCI HOUTZDALE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 3:2021cv00205
Filed: November 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Keith A Pesto
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM ORDER granting #6 Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. No certificate of appealability is issued. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 1/25/2022. (bgs)
January 24, 2022 Filing 6 First MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY. (Attachments: #1 Appendix to Motion to Dismiss) (Crilly, Warren)
January 24, 2022 Filing 5 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by WARDEN SCI HOUTZDALE. (Crilly, Warren)
January 24, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Warren L. Crilly, III on behalf of DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY. (Crilly, Warren)
December 8, 2021 Filing 3 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by JOSEPH TODARO, SR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (elt)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 RULE and ORDER: Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging petitioner's custody on the sentence imposed in Commonwealth v. Todaro, CP-11-CR-265-2017 (C.P.Cambria). The Clerk shall add the District Attorney of Cambria County to the docket as counsel for the respondent. Respondent WARDEN SCI HOUTZDALE, through the District Attorney of Cambria County, shall file a response on or before 1/31/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 11/30/2021. (bgs)
November 26, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 34668005774), filed by JOSEPH TODARO, SR. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Envelope) (elt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TODARO v. WARDEN SCI HOUTZDALE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSEPH TODARO, SR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN SCI HOUTZDALE
Represented By: Gregory J. Neugebauer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY
Represented By: Warren L. Crilly, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?