BLACK v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
Petitioner: JON A. BLACK
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, BARRY SMITH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 3:2021cv00218
Filed: December 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Keith A Pesto
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER denying #3 Second Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This matter will remain administratively closed (that is not a dismissal) until petitioner pays the filing fee or submits a motion to proceed IFP with an inmate account statement that complies with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 1/24/2022. (bgs)
January 21, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JON A. BLACK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (cww)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER FOR STATISTICAL CLOSING: The #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JON A. BLACK is denied without prejudice. The Clerk shall mark this matter administratively closed (that is not a dismissal) until petitioner pays the filing fee or submits a motion to proceed IFP with an inmate account statement that complies with the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 1/10/2022. (bgs)
December 27, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JON A. BLACK. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Envelope) (cww)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BLACK v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JON A. BLACK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BARRY SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?