SIPES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
| DENISE SIPES |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 3:2022cv00005 |
| January 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Stephanie L Haines |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Civil Rights: Other |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION Selecting ADR Process by DENISE SIPES. (Weisberg, Larry) |
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Weisberg, Larry) |
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 and 16.2, an Initial Rule 16 Case Management Conference shall be held on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, at 2:00 p.m., and as more fully stated in said Case Management Order. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 2/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Stipulation Selecting ADR Process, #2 Exhibit "B" - Fed.R.Civ. P. 26(f) Report, #3 Exhibit "C" - Initial Scheduling Order) (dlg)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (Truckley, Annamarie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Annamarie Truckley on behalf of COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (Truckley, Annamarie) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order) Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 01/25/2022. (dag)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dag) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by DENISE SIPES. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS served on 1/13/2022, answer due 2/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons returned - Service of PA Attorney General) (Weisberg, Larry) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (elt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-6889171), filed by DENISE SIPES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (elt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SIPES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DENISE SIPES | |
| Represented By: | Larry A. Weisberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS | |
| Represented By: | Annamarie Truckley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
