YARINA et al v. DOLLAR TREE, INC. et al
CAROL YARINA and KEN YARINA |
DOLLAR TREE, INC., DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., DOLLAR TREE, INC. trading and doing business as DOLLAR TREE and DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. trading and doing business as DOLLAR TREE |
3:2022cv00118 |
July 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Kim R Gibson |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiffs' Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents Directed to Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. t/d/b/a Dollar Tree by CAROL YARINA, KEN YARINA (Trust, Brad) |
Filing 18 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION - Mediation. David White is appointed as mediator. The ADR Conference shall be concluded on or before 12/1/2022, unless extended by Order of the Court. It is the responsibility of counsel to ensure that notice of the date, time and location of the mediation has been electronically filed with the Court on or before 11/1/2022, and as more fully stated in said Order Referring Case to ADR. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/8/2022. (dlg) |
Filing 17 INITIAL SCHEDULIING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2022; Joinder of Parties due by 12/1/2022. The parties shall complete all fact discovery by 3/1/2023. A Post-Discovery Status Conference is set for 4/4/2023, at 11:30 AM, and as more fully stated in said Initial Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/8/2022. (dlg) |
Filing 16 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kim R. Gibson: The Court held a case management conference with the parties appearing by telephone. The Court began by reviewing the parties' Stipulation Selecting ADR Process. The Court indicated that it would set the deadline for the completion of mediation for 12/1/2022. The Court then reviewed the parties' Proposed Initial Scheduling Order. The parties confirmed to the Court that all dates in the Proposed Initial Scheduling Order remain appropriate. The Court informed the parties that it will schedule a Post-Discovery Status Conference for a date in April 2023, and as more fully stated in said Conference Memo. (Court Reporter: None) (dlg) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiffs' Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosure by CAROL YARINA, KEN YARINA (Rohtla, Sean) |
Filing 14 Proposed Initial Scheduling Order (Joint) by CAROL YARINA, KEN YARINA. (Rohtla, Sean) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by CAROL YARINA, KEN YARINA. (Rohtla, Sean) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents Directed to Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. t/d/b/a Dollar Tree, by CAROL YARINA, KEN YARINA (Rohtla, Sean) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents Directed to Defendant, Dollar Tree, Inc. t/d/b/a Dollar Tree, by CAROL YARINA, KEN YARINA (Rohtla, Sean) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Raymond J. Hunter to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 8/16/2022. (dlg) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Trust, Brad) |
Filing 8 First MOTION for attorney Raymond J. Hunter to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Pursuant to Rule 53 (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-7241308) by DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., DOLLAR TREE, INC.. (Hunter, Raymond) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ERROR: Document should have been filed as two separate documents. CORRECTION: Attorney advised in future that documents of that nature are to be filed as separate documents. This message is for informational purposes only. (av) |
Filing 7 ORDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 and 16.2, an Initial Rule 16 Case Management Conference shall be held TELEPHONICALLY on September 8, 2022, at 10:30 a.m., and as more fully stated in said Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 8/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" - Stipulation Selecting ADR Process, #2 Exhibit "B" - Fed.R.Civ. P. 26(f) Report, #3 Exhibit "C" - Initial Scheduling Order) (dlg) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., DOLLAR TREE, INC.. (Evans, James (Jay)) |
Filing 5 NOTICE that the instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (krh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing of Notice of Removal with Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County, PA by DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., DOLLAR TREE, INC. (Evans, James (Jay)) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by DOLLAR TREE, INC. (av) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying DOLLAR TREE, INC. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. (av) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Cambria County, case number 2022-2127 with Jury Demand. Copies attached: Complaint; Docket Sheet; Civil Cover Sheet (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7214215), filed by CAROL YARINA, KEN YARINA. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Docket Sheet, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (av) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.