COFFELT v. UNDERWOOD
Petitioner: PHILLIP W. COFFELT
Respondent: WARDEN UNDERWOOD and WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Case Number: 3:2022cv00129
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Stephanie L Haines
Referring Judge: Keith A Pesto
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2022 Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT by PHILLIP W. COFFELT to #4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (jd)
September 8, 2022 Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT by PHILLIP W. COFFELT to #4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (jd)
August 25, 2022 Filing 8 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by M. UNDERWOOD. (Brown, Jacqueline)
August 25, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacqueline Brown on behalf of M. UNDERWOOD. (Brown, Jacqueline)
August 25, 2022 Judge Stephanie L. Haines presiding and Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto referred. (bgs)
August 22, 2022 Filing 6 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by PHILLIP W. COFFELT. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd)
August 11, 2022 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT in Support of #4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by PHILLIP W. COFFELT. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bgs)
August 11, 2022 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by PHILLIP W. COFFELT. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Appendix B, #3 Appendix C, #4 Appendix D, #5 Appendix E, #6 Appendix F, #7 Appendix G, #8 Envelope) (bgs)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 RULE and ORDER granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Marshal shall make service of the petition and this Order on the respondent (the Warden of F.C.I. Loretto), the Attorney General, and the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, costs to be advanced by the United States. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 8/11/2022. Copy mailed to non-ECF user. (bgs)
August 10, 2022 Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by PHILLIP W. COFFELT. (cel)
August 10, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by PHILLIP W. COFFELT. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Affidavit, #3 Appendix A, #4 Appendix B, #5 Appendix C, #6 Appendix D, #7 Appendix E, #8 Appendix F, #9 Appendix G, #10 Envelope) (cel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: COFFELT v. UNDERWOOD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PHILLIP W. COFFELT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN UNDERWOOD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN M. UNDERWOOD
Represented By: Jacqueline Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?