WALSH v. BANKOVICH
| MARTIN J. WALSH |
| PATRICK BANKOVICH, DUPENN, INC. doing business as IGM CARBON and DUPENN, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN |
| 3:2022cv00222 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Stephanie L Haines |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order) Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 12/7/2022. (dag)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dag) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to PATRICK BANKOVICH, DUPENN, INC., DUPENN, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (sdp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PATRICK BANKOVICH, DUPENN, INC., DUPENN, INC. 401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN ), filed by MARTIN J. WALSH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
| Judge Stephanie L. Haines added. (bgs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
