BREHM v. IRWIN, et al
| JOSHUA RYAN BREHM |
| RANDY IRWIN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CAMBRIA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHELLE HENRY |
| 3:2023cv00143 |
| June 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Kim R Gibson |
| Keith A Pesto |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 OBJECTIONS to #2 Report and Recommendation by JOSHUA RYAN BREHM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Envelope) (bjw) |
| Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by JOSHUA RYAN BREHM. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be denied before service and without a certificate of appealability. Objections to R&R due by 7/20/2023. Objections to R&R for Unregistered ECF Users due by 7/24/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 7/5/2023. Copy mailed to non-ECF user. (bgs) |
| Judge Kim R. Gibson presiding and Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto referred. (bgs) |
| Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto added as Presider. (bjw) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 300000163), filed by JOSHUA RYAN BREHM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Receipt) (bjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
