PLUMMER v. LITZINGER et al
| SHANE A. PLUMMER |
| WALLACE ZITZINGER, CAMBRIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and WALLACE LITZINGER |
| 3:2024cv00009 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Stephanie L Haines |
| Keith A Pesto |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 BRIEF in Support re #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by CAMBRIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. (Maierhofer, Mary) |
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM re #1 Complaint, by CAMBRIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Maierhofer, Mary) |
| Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto: Status Conference held on 2/26/2024. (Court Reporter: None) (Attachments: #1 Command Memorandum, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope) (bgs) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference set for 2/26/2024 at 10:00 AM via Video Conference before Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto. (bgs) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by CAMBRIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. (Maierhofer, Mary) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Lou Maierhofer on behalf of CAMBRIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. (Maierhofer, Mary) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by SHANE A. PLUMMER. CAMBRIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, WALLACE LITZINGER. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Hooper, Thomas) Modified text on 2/13/2024 to correct entry to include the names of the defendants. (jd) Modified text on 2/26/2024. (bgs) |
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM ORDER directing the plaintiff to effect proper service under Rule 4 on defendants and make proof of service under Rule 4(l)(1) on or before 5/7/2024, or the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice as provided in Rule 4(m) as to any defendant not served. If plaintiff wants the Marshal to make service (at plaintiff's expense) on the defendants, he should file a motion requesting an order to that effect. The administrative orders entered previously in this case are vacated as premature. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto on 2/5/2024. (bgs)
|
| Judge Stephanie L. Haines no longer assigned to case. (cel) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions (details more fully stated in said Order) Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 01/16/2024. (dag)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dag) |
| Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto added. (cel) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CAMBRIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, WALLACE LITZINGER (dmh) Modified text on 2/26/2024. (bgs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAMBRIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, WALLACE LITZINGER (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-8065370), filed by SHANE A. PLUMMER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (dmh) Modified text on 2/26/2024 to correct defendant's last name. (bgs) |
| Judge Stephanie L. Haines added. (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
