MILLER et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
| HOLLY E. WILLIAMS and MICHAEL LOUIS MILLER |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, KIMBERLY SANDERS, PETER J. WEEKS, JACKIE ATHERTON BERNARD, BLAIR COUNTY and WADE A. KAGARISE |
| 3:2024cv00245 |
| October 16, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Stephanie L Haines |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF COURT denying as moot #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Stephanie L. Haines on 11/20/2024. (dlg)
|
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against JACKIE ATHERTON BERNARD, BLAIR COUNTY, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, WADE A. KAGARISE, KIMBERLY SANDERS, PETER J. WEEKS, HOLLY E. WILLIAMS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number 300000517), filed by MICHAEL LOUIS MILLER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (tla) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $405.00, receipt number 300000517 (tla) |
| Judge Stephanie L. Haines added. (kss) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by MICHAEL LOUIS MILLER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cel) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MICHAEL LOUIS MILLER. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Envelope) (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
