Peguero-Moronta, et al v. Santiago, et al
3:2001cv01390 |
April 2, 2001 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
Jose A Fuste |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 256 OPINION AND ORDER: NOTED and MOOT 253 MOTION Requesting Remedy, 255 Second MOTION requesting Order; GRANTING 254 MOTION for voluntary reduction; GRANTING IN PART 244 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Litigation Expenses. We award Plaintiffs $372,490.73 in attorney's fees and $13,346.91 in costs and out-of-pocket expenses, for a total of $385,837.64. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 4/8/2010.(mrj) |
Filing 230 ORDER denying 226 Motion to Stay, for failure to post a supersedeas bond, and denying request for injunctive and corrective relief; granting 227 Motion for Contempt, as detailed in the expanded Order attached herein. Show Cause Hearing set for 11/13/2008 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 before the undersigned . Defendants must be present at the hearing and the court expects to make a bench ruling on the issue of contempt with immediate incarceration if the finding is adverse to Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 11/06/08. (mrj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Peguero-Moronta, et al v. Santiago, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.