Peguero-Moronta, et al v. Santiago, et al
Case Number: 3:2001cv01390
Filed: April 2, 2001
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
Presiding Judge: Jose A Fuste
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 256 OPINION AND ORDER: NOTED and MOOT 253 MOTION Requesting Remedy, 255 Second MOTION requesting Order; GRANTING 254 MOTION for voluntary reduction; GRANTING IN PART 244 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Litigation Expenses. We award Plaintiffs $372,490.73 in attorney's fees and $13,346.91 in costs and out-of-pocket expenses, for a total of $385,837.64. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 4/8/2010.(mrj)
November 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 230 ORDER denying 226 Motion to Stay, for failure to post a supersedeas bond, and denying request for injunctive and corrective relief; granting 227 Motion for Contempt, as detailed in the expanded Order attached herein. Show Cause Hearing set for 11/13/2008 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 before the undersigned . Defendants must be present at the hearing and the court expects to make a bench ruling on the issue of contempt with immediate incarceration if the finding is adverse to Defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 11/06/08. (mrj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peguero-Moronta, et al v. Santiago, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?