Taboas-Colon et al v. Diaz-Gonzalez et al
3:2004cv02371 |
December 14, 2004 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
Salvador E Casellas |
Securities/Commodities |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 228 OPINION AND ORDER. DENIED 205 Motion to Alter Judgment; GRANTED 206 Motion Joining Co-Defendants motion to alter judgment; DENIED 220 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Angelo Diaz-Gonzalez; GRANTED 225 MOTION for extension of time unti l ruling from the court to file document filed by Angelo Diaz-Gonzalez. Hearing on Damages is SET for 11/10/2009 at 10:00 AM in SEC's Courtroom in Old San Juan, before Judge Salvador E Casellas. Signed by Judge Salvador E Casellas on 10/26/2009.(LB) |
Filing 201 OPINION AND ORDER. GRANTED in part and DENIED in part 130 MOTION for Summary Judgment in Relation to Damages as to Codefendant Mr. Angelo Diaz. Signed by Judge Salvador E Casellas on 2/19/2009.(LB) |
Filing 193 OPINION AND ORDER denying 137 MOTION to Set Aside Default. Signed by Judge Salvador E Casellas on 1/23/2009.(LB) Modified on 1/26/2009 to add docket text and create link to motion. (ni). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Taboas-Colon et al v. Diaz-Gonzalez et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.