Marrero-Rosado et al v. Cartagena et al
Case Number: 3:2005cv02063
Filed: October 3, 2005
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: San Juan Office
Presiding Judge: Salvador E Casellas
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 153 OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 138 MOTION to Strike; GRANTING IN PART 121 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against all Defendants in their official capacities are DISMISSED pursuant to the court's prior Opinion, O rder, and Partial Judgment. Defendants' Motion on Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims against Defendants Santiago, Cartagena, Pereira, Diaz, and Armendariz in their personal capacities is GRANTED. Having summarily disposed of Plaintiff's S ection 1983 claims against Defendants Santiago, Cartagena, Pereira, Diaz, and Armendariz, Plaintiff's supplemental claims brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) against the same Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 136 7(c)(3). The issue remaining to be adjudicated in this case is Plaintiff's Section 1983 claim against Defendant Roman for an alleged Fourth Amendment violation. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 3/27/09.(mrj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marrero-Rosado et al v. Cartagena et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?