Mercado-Echevarria v. Department of Corrections et al
Julia Mercado-Echevarria |
Department of Corrections, Miguel A. Pereira-Castillo, Fernando Fernandez-Correa, Annie Gonzalez, Hilda Santos, Ivette Bondon-Gonzalez, Rafael Santiago and Juan Eliza |
3:2007cv02134 |
November 29, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
Ponce |
Jose A Fuste |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 101 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 31 MOTION to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Juan Eliza and UGT; GRANTING IN PART 53 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings; DENYING AS MOOT 91 Supplemental Motion re: 84 MOTION for Reconsideration, 88 MOTION for Reconsideration re 81 Order on Motion for Leave to File, 84 MOTION for Reconsideration, AND 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment. We DISMISS all claims against Defendants Juan Eliza and Union General de Trabajadores. We also DISMISS Plaintiffs 039; Law 100 claims. Remaining are Plaintiffs' Title VII claims against the Department of Corrections and Plaintiffs' Law 17, Law 69, and Article 1802 claims. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 8/10/09.(mrj) |
Filing 28 ORDER denying as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 2/9/09. (mrj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.