Diaz-Figueroa v. Ricoh Puerto Rico, Inc.
Plaintiff: Magali Diaz-Figueroa
Defendant: Ricoh Puerto Rico, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008cv01302
Filed: March 12, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: Labor: Other Office
County: San Juan
Presiding Judge: Jaime Pieras, Jr
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 73 OPINION AND ORDER - GRANTING Defendant's 55 Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof. Signed by Judge Jaime Pieras, Jr. on 10/7/2009. (mld)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaz-Figueroa v. Ricoh Puerto Rico, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Magali Diaz-Figueroa
Represented By: Maria T. Juan-Urrutia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ricoh Puerto Rico, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?