Lopez- Acosta v. Toledo et al
| Jose Lopez- Acosta |
| Pedro Toledo, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Juan C. Melendez- Rivera, Conjugal Partnership Doe- Alvarado, Conjugal Partnership Melendez- Doe 2, Insurance Company A to Z and John Doe |
| 3:2008cv01314 |
| March 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| San Juan |
| Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
JUDGMENT dismissing plaintiff's federal claims against Pedro Toledo, Jose R. Alvarado-Almodovar, and Juan C. Melendez-Rivera with prejudice. This case is now closed for statistical purposes. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 8/5/2008.(ab)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER VACATING #24 Partial Judgment. Final Judgment shall be entered by the Court. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 8/5/08. (VA)
|
|
Filing 24
***VACATED AS PER DKT.25 ORDER*** PARTIAL JUDGMENT dismissing plaintiff's federal claims against Pedro Toledo, Jose R. Alvarado-Almodovar, and Juan C. Melendez-Rivera with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 7/28/2008.(ab) Modified on 8/5/2008 (ab).
|
|
Filing 23
OPINION AND ORDER granting #11 MOTION to dismiss and Memorandum in Support Therof as to Pedro Toledo, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Juan C. Melendez- Rivera. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 7/28/08. (VA)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER noted #20 INFORMATIVE motion. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 7/11/08. (VA)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER VACATING 19 Order on Motion for extension of time. Defendants are no longer required to file an informative motion. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 7/11/08.(VA)
|
| Filing 20 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding docket #17 filed by Lorenzo J. Palomares-Starbuck on behalf of Jose Lopez- Acosta (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Palomares-Starbuck, Lorenzo) |
|
Filing 19
***VACATED AS PER DKT. 21 ORDER*** ORDER granting #18 Motion for extension of time. Informative Motion due by 7/31/2008. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 7/10/08. (VA) Modified on 7/14/2008 (ab).
|
| Filing 18 MOTION for extension of time until July 31, 2008 to Comply with Order (Docket No. 17) filed by Jose J. Gueits-Ortiz on behalf of Pedro Toledo, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Juan C. Melendez- Rivera Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/28/2008 (Gueits-Ortiz, Jose) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER: The parties are ordered to file an informative motion detailing the criminal proceeding s that took place in the state court. Specifically, the parties must provide this Court the date when Plaintiff first appeared before a state court judge. Furthermore, the parties are to detail the extent of the judicial proccedings that occurred before the state court if any. The parties are to provide pertinent dates regarding said proceedings. Informative Motions due by 7/10/2008. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 7/8/08. (VA)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER striking #14 Amended Complaint filed by Jose Lopez- Acosta for failing to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 7/7/08. (VA)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER denying #12 Motion requesting Order. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 7/3/08. (VA)
|
| Filing 14 ***STRICKEN AS PER DKT. 16 ORDER*** AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST against all defendants, filed by Jose Lopez- Acosta. Service due by 11/3/2008,(Palomares-Starbuck, Lorenzo) Modified on 7/8/2008 (ab). |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion filed by Jose Lopez- Acosta Re: #12 MOTION requesting Order to adjudicate Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as Unopposed by Plaintiff filed by Juan C. Melendez- Rivera, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Pedro Toledo, #11 MOTION to dismiss and Memorandum in Support Therof as to Pedro Toledo, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Juan C. Melendez- Rivera filed by Juan C. Melendez- Rivera, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Pedro Toledo filed by Jose Lopez- Acosta. (Palomares-Starbuck, Lorenzo) |
| Filing 12 MOTION requesting Order to adjudicate Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as Unopposed by Plaintiff filed by Jose J. Gueits-Ortiz on behalf of Pedro Toledo, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Juan C. Melendez- Rivera (Gueits-Ortiz, Jose) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to dismiss and Memorandum in Support Therof as to Pedro Toledo, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Juan C. Melendez- Rivera filed by Jose J. Gueits-Ortiz on behalf of Pedro Toledo, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Juan C. Melendez- Rivera Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/19/2008 (Gueits-Ortiz, Jose) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer deadline due by 6/3/2008. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 5/5/08. (VA)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time until June 3, 2008 to File Answer or Otherwise Plead filed by Jose J. Gueits-Ortiz on behalf of Juan C. Melendez- Rivera Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/21/2008 (Gueits-Ortiz, Jose) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer deadline due by 6/3/2008. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 4/15/08. (VA)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time until June 3, 2008 to File Answer or Otherwise Plead filed byJose J. Gueits-Ortiz on behalf of Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/30/2008 (Gueits-Ortiz, Jose) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Answer deadline due by 6/3/2008. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 4/4/08. (VA)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time until June 3, 2008 to File Answer to the Complaint or Otherwise Plead re: #1 Complaint, filed by Jose Lopez- Acosta filed byJose J. Gueits-Ortiz on behalf of Pedro Toledo Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/20/2008 (Related document(s) #1 ) (Gueits-Ortiz, Jose) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jose Lopez- Acosta upon Juan C. Melendez- Rivera served on 3/24/2008, answer due 4/13/2008; Conjugal Partnership Melendez-Doe 2 served on 03/24/2008, answer due 04/13/2008; Jose R. Alvarado-Almodovar served on 03/24/2008, answer due 4/13/2008; Pedro Toledo served on 03/17/2008, answer due 4/6/2008; (Palomares-Starbuck, Lorenzo) Modified on 4/3/2008 to add answer due date and parties(ab). |
| NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: #3 Summons Returned Executed. ***FILED IN ERROR, MISSING INFORMATION IN PDF, COUNSEL TO REFILE DOCUMENTS*** (ab) |
| Filing 3 ***FILED IN ERROR***SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jose Lopez- Acosta upon Pedro Toledo served on 3/17/2008, answer due 4/6/2008; Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar served on 3/24/2008, answer due 4/13/2008; Juan C. Melendez- Rivera served on 3/24/2008, answer due 4/13/2008; Conjugal Partnership Alvarado-Doe served on 3/24/2008, answer due 4/13/2008; Conjugal Partnership Melendez- Doe 2 served on 3/24/2008, answer due 4/13/2008. (Palomares-Starbuck, Lorenzo) Modified on 4/1/2008 (ab). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Pedro Toledo, Pedro Toledo through Roberto Sanchez Ramos, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Juan C. Melendez- Rivera, Conjugal Partnership Melendez- Doe 2 Service due by 7/15/2008. (ab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pedro Toledo, Jose R Alvarado- Almodovar, Juan C. Melendez- Rivera, Conjugal Partnership Alvarado-Doe, Conjugal Partnership Melendez- Doe 2, Insurance Company A to Z, John Doe filed by Jose Lopez- Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Palomares-Starbuck, Lorenzo) Modified on 3/17/2008 as to parties (ab). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
