Ramirez-Lluveras v. Pagan-Cruz
| Evelyn Ramirez-Lluveras, Jenitza Caceres, MC and MAC |
| Javier Pagan-Cruz, Carlos Sustache-Sustache, Zulma Diaz, Edwin Rivera-Merced, Victor Cruz and John Doe A-Z |
| 3:2008cv01486 |
| April 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| San Juan |
| Raymond L. Acosta |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
490
OPINION AND ORDER re 468 Motion to Dismiss and Motion for New Trial; re 469 Motion to Dismiss and Motion for New Trial. The Court DENIES defendant Carlos Sustache-Sustache's motion pursuant to Rule 50 and Rule 59, (Docket No. 468), and DENIES defendant Zulma Diaz's motion pursuant to Rule 50 and Rule 59, (Docket No. 469). Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 01/28/2013. (brc)
|
|
Filing
404
OPINION AND ORDER re 394 Motion in Compliance: NOTED. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to plaintiffs' claims brought against Sustache and Diaz pursuant to the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 05/21/2012. (brc)
|
|
Filing
387
OPINION AND ORDER re 354 Motion in Limine; and 369 Motion in Compliance. The Court GRANTS plaintiffs' motion in limine to exclude any mention, evidence, or argument pertaining to the acquittal of defendants Sustache and Diaz in their criminal trial, and deems MOOT plaintiffs' request to exclude expert testimony from Santiago-Rullan. The Court also NOTES the plaintiffs' special damages brief and allows plaintiffs to proceed with their allegations of special damages in their personal capacity wrongful death action pursuant to article 1802 of the Civil Code. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 04/27/2012. (brc)
|
|
Filing
382
OPINION AND ORDER re 365 Motion for Judgment. Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs' motion is GRANTED as to Pagan's liability pursuant to section 1983 for a Fourth amendm ent violation, and pursuant to article 1802. Summary judgment is GRANTED in Pagan's favor with respect to plaintiffs' claims under the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than 4/30/2012 at 5:00 p.m., why the Court should not grant summary judgment in favor of defendants Diaz and Sustache-Sustache with respect to plaintiffs' claims brought pursuant to the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 04/23/2012. (brc)
|
|
Filing
353
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 344 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration on the Court's Rule 54(b) ruling is DENIED. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 01/20/2012. (brc)
|
|
Filing
338
OPINION AND ORDER re 249 Motion for Summary Judgment. Because plaintiffs' have not established that the supervisory defendants behavior was casually related to Caceres' injury, the supervisory defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' section 1983 and article 1802 claims against the supervisory defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 12/22/2011. (brc)
|
|
Filing
332
OPINION AND ORDER re 113 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Defendants' motion to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 10/03/2011. (brc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
