Santiago-Negron v. Carlos Albizu University, Inc. (CAU) et al
| Francisca Santiago-Negron |
| Carlos Albizu University, Inc. (CAU), Board of Trustees of CAU, Peter Poe, Sarah Moe, Jorge Gonzalez-Monclova, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Gonzalez-Doe, Ileana Rodriguez-Garcia, Peter Moe, jugal Partnership Moe-Rodriguez, Angeles Perez-Toro, Richard Roe, Conjugal Partnership Roe-Perez, Carmen Acevedo-Rios, Sam Poe, Conjugal Partnership Poe-Acevedo and Insurance Companies A to J |
| 3:2008cv01612 |
| June 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| San Juan |
| Jose A Fuste |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 63 MOTION requesting Order Payment of Costs; DENYING 65 , 75 MOTION for Attorney Fees. We ORDER Plaintiff to pay Defendants the amount of $3,136.02 in costs. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 1/15/10.(mrj)
|
|
Filing
59
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Conjugal Partnership Gonzalez-Doe, Jorge Gonzalez-Monclova, Board of Trustees of CAU, Carlos Albizu University, Inc. (CAU), Carmen Acevedo-Rios, Angeles Perez-Toro, Ileana Rodriguez-Garcia. We DISMISS all federal claims WITH PREJUDICE, and DISMISS all claims under Puerto Rico law WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Judgment to be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 8/25/09.(mrj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
