Baez-Viera et al v. Cooperativa Abraham Rosa et al
| Rosa Baez-Viera, John Doe and Conjugal Partnership Doe-Baez |
| Cooperativa Abraham Rosa, Luis Lopez-Roman, Jane Doe, Conjugal Partnership Lopez-Doe and Insurance Company ABC |
| 3:2008cv02045 |
| September 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Adjuntas |
| Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
180
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART 164 MOTION to Alter Judgment or Amend Judgment; NOTING 159 MOTION Submitting Defendant's Memorandum On Back Pay. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 9/28/2012.(RJC)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 motion for summary judgment; adopting in part Report and Recommendation re 92 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED on Plaintiff's claims of ADEA age d iscrimination, PDA retaliation and pregnancy discrimination, and claims under Puerto Rico Laws 69, 80, and 100. Summary Judgment is GRANTED on Plaintiff's claims of PDA and ADEA hostile work environment, ADEA retaliation, and claims under Puerto Rico Law 3. Partial judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 8/30/2011. (LL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
