Sea Star Line Caribbean, LLC. v. M/V SUNSHINE SPIRIT

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Puerto Rico District Court Sea Star Line Caribbean, LLC. v. M/V SUNSHINE SPIRIT

Sea Star Line Caribbean, LLC. v. M/V SUNSHINE SPIRIT

Plaintiff:	Sea Star Line Caribbean, LLC.
Defendant:	M/V SUNSHINE SPIRIT
Case Number:	3:2009cv01152
Filed:	February 18, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office:	Contract: Marine Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Jose A Fuste
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:1333 Admiralty

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 13, 2009	Filing 113 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 60 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment AND 95 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Radiance Shipping Line, LLC; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 79 MOTION to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdictio n, filed by Sea Star Line Caribbean, LLC.; DENYING 83 MOTION to transfer case; DENYING AS MOOT 100 MOTION to Strike Affidavits, AND 101 MOTION requesting That Plaintiff's First Request for Admissions Be Deemed Admitted; and DENYING 110 M OTION to Continue filed by Radiance Shipping Line, LLC. We DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Claimant's complaint only with respect to the portion of its claim for unjust enrichment that is based upon benefits conferred by Hugo Stamp. We VACATE the arrest of M/V Sunshine Spirit. Trial will proceed on the remaining issue of the extent of Libelant's liability to Claimant. Parties strongly urged to sit down and settle the case before the November 16 trial. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 11/13/09.(mrj)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 13, 2009

Filing 113 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 60 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment AND 95 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Radiance Shipping Line, LLC; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 79 MOTION to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdictio n, filed by Sea Star Line Caribbean, LLC.; DENYING 83 MOTION to transfer case; DENYING AS MOOT 100 MOTION to Strike Affidavits, AND 101 MOTION requesting That Plaintiff's First Request for Admissions Be Deemed Admitted; and DENYING 110 M OTION to Continue filed by Radiance Shipping Line, LLC. We DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE Claimant's complaint only with respect to the portion of its claim for unjust enrichment that is based upon benefits conferred by Hugo Stamp. We VACATE the arrest of M/V Sunshine Spirit. Trial will proceed on the remaining issue of the extent of Libelant's liability to Claimant. Parties strongly urged to sit down and settle the case before the November 16 trial. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 11/13/09.(mrj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sea Star Line Caribbean, LLC. v. M/V SUNSHINE SPIRIT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sea Star Line Caribbean, LLC.
Represented By:	Jose F. Sarraga-Venegas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: M/V SUNSHINE SPIRIT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?