Chico Service Station, Inc. et al v. Sol Puerto Rico Limited
| Jose Chico and Chico Service Station, Inc. |
| Sol Puerto Rico Limited |
| 3:2009cv01342 |
| April 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| San Juan |
| Jose A Fuste |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 Resource & Recovery Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER DENYING 38 Motion Requesting Reconsideration and Alteration or Amendment of Judgment Re: 36 Opinion and Order. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 1/11/10.(mrj)
|
|
Filing
36
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 6 MOTION to Dismiss as to Sol Puerto Rico Limited, filed by Sol Puerto Rico Limited; NOTED 30 Motion in Compliance with Order, filed by Jose Chico, Chico Service Station, Inc. We DISMISS Plaintiffs' complaint on Burford abstention considerations. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 12/4/09.(mrj)
|
|
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER re 6 MOTION to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Sol Puerto Rico Limited. For the reasons stated in our expanded Opinion, we hereby ORDER Plaintiffs to SHOW CAUSE, on or before October 30, 2009, as to why we should not dismiss their case on the basis of res judicata. We reserve judgment on Defendant's motion for dismissal (Docket No. 6 ) pending the resolution of this order to show cause. Show Cause Response due by 10/30/2009. Signed by Chief Judge Jose A Fuste on 10/14/09.(mrj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
