Alvarado v. Potter
Plaintiff: Alex Alvarado
Defendant: John Potter
Case Number: 3:2009cv01346
Filed: April 14, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other Office
County: Adjuntas
Presiding Judge: Francisco A. Besosa
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 48 OPINION AND ORDER re 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. The Jury Trial scheduled to commence on 5/9/2011 is vacated and set aside. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 05/04/2011. (brc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alvarado v. Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alex Alvarado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Potter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?