Febus Cruz et al v. Sauri Santiago et al
| Julio F. Febus-Cruz, Ana H. Ortega-Matos and Conjugal Partnership Febus-Ortega |
| Heriberto Sauri-Santiago, Emanuel Cantres Carmona and Salvador Collazo Cartagena |
| 3:2009cv01365 |
| April 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Barranquitas |
| Francisco A. Besosa |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER re 53 Motion for Summary Judgment: DENIED. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 09/03/2009. (brc)
|
|
Filing
45
OPINION AND ORDER re 32 Motion to dismiss: GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court DISMISSES all of Febus's federal claims against Cantres; DISMISSES Febus's political discrimination claim against Sauri in his individual capacity; DISMISSES Febus's political discrimination claim against Collazo in his official capacity; DISMISSES Febus's procedural due process claims against all defendants; and DISMISSES Febus's equal protection claims against all defendants. B ecause the First Amendment claim remains against Collazo in his personal capacity, as well as against Sauri in his official capacity, the Court retains jurisdiction over the Commonwealth law claims against those two defendants only; the Commonwealth claims against Cantres are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Francisco A. Besosa on 07/23/2009. (brc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
