Torres-Vazquez v. Doral Bank of Puerto Rico
| Zaida Torres-Vazquez |
| Doral Bank of Puerto Rico |
| 3:2009cv01702 |
| July 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
| San Juan Office |
| Humacao |
| Salvador E Casellas |
| None |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 54 defendant Doral Bank of Puerto Rico's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Salvador E. Casellas on 4/29/11. (PR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Torres-Vazquez v. Doral Bank of Puerto Rico | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Doral Bank of Puerto Rico | |
| Represented By: | Diana M. Espinosa-Nunez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Zaida Torres-Vazquez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
