Prince, Lobel, Glovsky & Tye, LLP v. Guillemard-Ginorio et al
Prince, Lobel, Glovsky & Tye, LLP |
Andres Guillemard-Ginorio, Maria M. Noble-Fernandez, Conjugal Partnership Guillemard-Ginorio and Noble Fernandez, Lone Star Insurance Producers, Inc. and Secretary of the Treasury of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico |
3:2010cv01196 |
March 8, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico |
San Juan Office |
San Juan |
Justo Arenas |
Jay A Garcia-Gregory |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 OPINION AND ORDER granting 39 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 47 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 53 Motion for Leave to File; denying 58 Motion to Lift Stay and for immediate injunctive relief ; noted 59 INFORMATIVE motion regarding re quest for status conference; adopting Report and Recommendation re 63 Report and Recommendation; finding as moot 15 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Jay A Garcia-Gregory on 1/19/2011. (ab) |
Filing 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying re 58 MOTION to lift stay and for immediate injunctive relief re 56 Order Staying Case filed by Prince, Lobel, Glovsky & Tye, LLP Objections to R&R due by 11/8/2010Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Justo Arenas on 10/20/2010.(nydi) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.