Ramirez de Arellano v. Budenheim USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Temistocles Ramirez de Arellano
Defendant: Budenheim USA, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2010cv01490
Filed: June 3, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico
Office: San Juan Office
County: San Juan
Nature of Suit: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER denying 11 Motion to Remand to State Court. Plaintiff has ten (10) days from the entry of this order to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss (Docket No. 6). NO EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED. Response to Motion Deadline due by 10/4/2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez-Gimenez on 9/22/2010. (PMA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Puerto Rico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramirez de Arellano v. Budenheim USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Temistocles Ramirez de Arellano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Budenheim USA, Inc.
Represented By: Jason R. Aguilo-Suro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?